March of Cannabis: hypocrisy, disgust and bad example through the web
May 3, 2008 6 comments
I was soon put the product with the interview with Robert Cailliau, co-creator of the web and had the misfortune, or rather, the desgra ç to know about the initiative asqueirosa March of Cannabis…
Organizers of this desprez í level and morally false initiative in favour of marijuana has on its web site, including a virtual store that offers shirts that are sold to pay for "demonstrations" (and, of course, buy drugs for participants).
The false moralism, the hypocrisy and falsehood go to the point that in one of the sections of the site, "Guide to recommendations of the march," is written:
Do not use or light marijuana or other drugs. Remember that there is no crime and march was organized to commit crimes, encourage them or make apology, but rather to stimulate reforms in public policies and laws on marijuana and other drugs and demand more access to dialogue with the State.
"The march was not organized to commit crimes, encourage them or make apology?" Who wrote it was addicted, at the time! Take the name of "event": March of Cannabis! How are not encouraging crimes, his cambada of hypocrites!
And this flock (in the sense of criminal law, even) is so closed, that moreover, raises the site shows that the law, legal and legally, that this movement is completely illegal! It's the Law No 11.343/06 that, in its section informs OF CRIMES:
Art 33
Paragraph 2 º induce, encourage or assist anybody to misuse of drugs:
Penalty - holding, one (1) to 3 (three) years and fine of 100 (one hundred) to 300 (three hundred)-day fine.
I am not a lawyer, but if the march of MACONHA not calls the misuse of drugs, sincerely the few concepts of law that I know of no good for nothing!
And wonder see that this passage found in the section "Is it a crime to make glorification of marijuana" (ai, ai…):
The lovers and defenders of cannabis people are equal to you, citizens, and who look for their families, work and pay taxes.
Look here, you (s) who wrote (RAM) that (as were drugged, probably): will not (m) compare well with the citizens of that false types apregoam a false moralism! Drop (in) the hand of hypocrisy and attempt to manipulate the ç ã! As someone who contributes to the organized trafficking can speak something like this? As someone who finance wars and killings can be someone "well, that is careful in his family"?
Or everyone who vai and / or a sympathizer of the illegal passeatazinha has a planting marijuana in the backyard of the house and do not need to use a drug trafficker to consume their daily?
I am very sad to know of the existence of such activity, further using the web, which is the area where I work and I like both. More sad to see that I am still there are pseudo-professional web which have to do this genre sites and constribuir with crimes like these (see article above). Percebam inclusive, which in any part of the site are the claims of those who made the site…
Blogs that I signed the feed and whose perpetrators have liked a "propagandinha" this pseudo-event have already been excluded from my list! A reader can not make the least difference to them, but my part I know I'm doing!
Look, personally, I know not express how angry and I'm with nerve size and face of these people stick to hold it there… The most that I can do, unfortunately, is writing this article to express what I feel and invite the who else shares this sentiment to join me.
Who has a blog, site, access to printed media, or know a person be influential, please do its "propaganda" in favour of Law so that this immoral and illegal passeata no longer exists!
While there are people who think so, Brazil will continue to be the country that has always been hypocritical.
Stop relying on "Tropa de Elite", and live the reality. Commence, for example, by reading this article written by Tico Santa Cruz (which at that time you must be referring to 'maconheiro': http://oglobo.globo.com/opiniao/mat/2008/04/16/a_marcha_da_maconha_a_hipocrisia- 426881471.asp
As Brazil is a democratic country, freedom of expression is guaranteed (or should be, see the episode as possible blockage of the portal Wordpress in Brazil and even in this matter, the ban on the march in some Brazilian states). So respect their arguments, which in my opinion, are exaggerated by false moralism.
Abraços
Totally against this motion camouflaged!
@ Stephen
I have read the material you've referred the matter and read about you put on your blog; sinceramenta, both positions seem to someone who consumes this type of drug (and, see above lines, contributes to trafficking and organized killings and etc.) and wants more "freedom" to do so with more tranquility, it should be this way.
Freedom of expression is guaranteed, but, as shown in the text of the article, you must have read in full, there is a law that says that any incitement to misuse of drugs is Criminal!
And, frankly, you both, such as Tico, regardless of being defending this movement degrading, they will agree that this movement INSTIGA, YES, the use of drugs.
And I saw on TV yesterday, the "types" who participated in the movement. Me seemed more with people wanting to enjoy the freedom to consume their daily droguinha than those who are, supposedly, seeking those things that are false in the official website of the "march".
So, Stephen, say how you told me: respect their arguments, but I do not agree with them or a little and VERY LEAST with that criminal Lobby that, for me, is people "weight" behind with intent addition of "freedom"…
Abraços and thank you for letting your opinion!
Dear Tárcio,
I believe that you have a serious problem with stereotypes and prejudice ante with the people who think or act differently than you. This can be seen in several parts of their topic, such as: ""
"… Pay for" demonstrations "(and, of course, buy drugs for participants)…." To say with certainty that you do not know how much marijuana. Pure and achismo accusation without evidence, worth up to a process. With 30 real you can leave any user of marijuana pleased a full week.
"The march was not organized to commit crimes, encourage them or make apology"? Who wrote it was addicted, at the time. " Condoning just because the name of the march was "March of Cannabis"? Because if the intention is to decriminalise marijuana, as you think it should be called? It seems some kind of fear or shame that some relative or friend of his some day come to use marijuana - and you can be sure that this is already happening. I can not find another explanation for someone feel so afraid of the word "Cannabis".
I believe the problem to be "closed" does not apply to the organisers of the march when on the Law No 11.343/06. There says: "induce, encourage or assist anybody to misuse of drugs." Are you sure you read and the respect of what is the march? You have seen elsewhere on the site or some poster written in passeatas "Cannabis Smoke"? Or, for you, the mere mention of the name is already induced to use? It is a damn word now? For me it is clear that neither their meagre knowledge of law you are truly useful.
"The defenders of cannabis lovers and people are equal to you, citizens, and who look for their families, work and pay taxes.." That is true my dear, I have several friends who act exactly that way. Or you believe that every user of any drug is a vagabundo that does not mind with anything? This of course has its bias of so many movies and novels that you attended where the stereotype of the user of drugs is always wrong and no idea what you do.
"As someone who contributes to the organized trafficking can speak something like this?". It's simple: who is buying marijuana trafficking does not grow up being banned or market. When we try to tell you that the evils of marijuana itself is smaller than the prohibition of same, or are accused of incitement to drugs, or are physically beaten by police, or are prohibited from saying anything. This line of thought leads to the clear conclusion that is not allowed or at least talk about it, since even in universities, as we have seen in recent UFMG in fact, ends with invasions police, prisons and even unjustified attack on students. It is this type of law and order you want in your country? And when is the right who want to take your, which vai be your reaction?
"Either everyone who vai…", "… has a plantation of marijuana." I really believe that not all have one foot at home, because it is prohibited. The marijuana growing as fast and as easy as weeds, but the only way to have one at home without drawing attention is mounting greenhouses and spending the tubes with equipment, fertilizers and electricity. How do you think most users of marijuana vai to invest both in cultivation "in-door" that way? Sorry, but the only way is buying with the traffickers, because only they "may" sell marijuana.
"More still am sad to see that there are pseudo-professional…." Where is the illegality of the site, to call us, the IT professionals, pseudo-professional? Just because the word damn "is present in the entire site? You read somewhere on the site a text encouraging the use of grass? Or the most you saw was a request for it to be better discussed?
"I have read the material you've referred the matter and read about…." Then you for any person who is for the legalization of marijuana is maconheiro, vagabundo and contributes to trafficking in drugs? So what about the lawyer Evandro Lins e Silva, one of the most renowned jurists of the country, which has always expressed openly in favour of the legalization of drugs? What about the senator Jéferson Peres (PDT), which is also conducive to a continental legalization? What about the FHC, who has done studies with Portugal during his government for the legalization of drugs in the two countries, and last week, when opened, the Committee to Combat Drugs in Latin America, assumed that the legalization of drugs can be considered and will be studied seriously by the committee? Do you think they are also users of drugs?
"Freedom of expression is guaranteed,…." To you and that is encouraging the use of drugs? Saying "Legaliza the marijuana" is encouraging? And if I say "Legalize abortion" or "Legalize the Death Penalty," I would be making apology to the crime of murder?
"And I saw on TV yesterday, the" types "who participated in the movement…." How well "tipinhos"? You chatted with any of them? You know what they think regarding policy on drugs? So how can you say that its intentions are only able to smoke a peace based on? And even if this is the only reason why they were there, what's wrong in withdrawing from a marginal product of heavily armed and dangerous and put it in the backyard of the house of each consumer, where nobody vai dying for your use?
"VERY LEAST with that criminal… Lobby." You are certain that this "criminal lobby" exists? Do you think the traffickers, which exist only because there is a prohibitionist law to drug use, would finance a campaign that extinguiria its existence? I say it not, and still aponto for you where is the real criminal lobby:
Did you know that the low-caliber weapons that end up in the hands of marginal in their vast majority are manufactured in Brazil by Taurus? Did you know that these weapons are primarily exported legally from Brazil to neighbouring countries where they can be sold freely, and then return to Brazil in the form of trafficking with drugs?
Did you know that these same companies also finance campaigns of politicians who are against the disarmament and against the legalization of drugs? And those same politicians (Tarso Genro (Justice) and Nelson Jobim (Defence)), want the tax paid by these countries in the purchase of our weapons is terminated so that we can export more, with the explanation that more weapons sold on the market external mean fewer weapons circulating in the domestic market, although the obvious way that these weapons are back on the illegality in our territory? In other words, what we will be more illegal weapons circulating around here.
It is, however you (and I, even with different viewpoints) want an end to the trafficking, vai you never see that day, because he who moves the entire market of arms in Brazil and America Latinha. Do not think that men in power want to keep drugs away from people by worrying about their health. What they want in reality is that trafficking in drugs always there, because that vai keep the market of venda of weapons, even illegal, always heated, the manufacturers of arms in Brazil (CBC and Taurus) are going to continue being one of the largest manufacturers of weapons in the world, politicians will continue taking their campaigns always fat and full of money from these companies, and people will continue believing they are unprotected and that only the Justice and the police with their weapons could save them. These people will never know that in fact are controlled by fear. The political interests and money by tráz that are greater than the welfare of society.
Now that you know of other "criminal Lobby," I hope that you use that knowledge to something more useful than to acknowledge both the people using the case of prejudice and stereotypes hollywoodianos and global…
@ Hell
Hello, my dear, Hell! Look, I say that as your comments are they really worth the pain of the answer! Blog is for this reason even to address an issue, receive a "cuspida in the face" of who does not agree, discuss more and more, finally… I very much an extension of your comment and know some things that I really did not know!
But one thing I know is how much marijuana, you can be sure! Where I live has at least 3 or more mouths, which is a well next to my house. Then, on that, can be relaxed.
As for the name of the movement, do not really know how it should be; what I know (I think) is that, of course, with this name he does apology, yes… I'm sure that intelectos behind the movement could think of something better, if wanted (but, you and I know that not).
When you say "You have seen elsewhere on the site or some poster written in passeatas' Smoke Cannabis'?", Frankly I do not think that you think something should be as explicit to be true… The word "suggestion" says a lot to the case.
As for his "Sorry, but the only way is buying with the traffickers, because only they" may "sell marijuana," I say you should go "order" is for families of the thousands who are killed daily in the light of " damn. " From my part, I SINTO VERY by this type of thing happen and continue happening, and, as I said in the text, the most I can do about it is to write text and trying to mobilize people guiding me by the sense that I have.
Oh, and a "feel very" to the plantation home is something very easy to talk to justify the financing of deaths, torture and corruption (at least from my point of view).
As the history of arms, should really be true what you said, unfortunately, you used the old tactic "but they also do", trying to "whitewash" all the evils that DRUGS provide to society… My text was on the march Cannabis, not on the march of weapons, if it also causes damage of the same gender, there "are other 500".
And, frankly, at least in my view, when I see in the mirror I do not think worshipper of "stereotypes hollywoodianos", such that I do not think "pretty nice", "legal" or "off" smoking marijuana or using any other drugs ( as you may have noticed), which is that yes, what the "filmecos" try to go to the public.
Finally, Hell, as I said I was pleased we can discuss in a little more on the subject. As in most of the discussions, both sides entering and leaving with the same thought. You still smoking and defending their point of view and I continue with my writings with "sparse knowledge in law," trying, at least as far achieved, soften the rot that is our world.
Sorry forgot to mention if any part of his comment, is that online discussions are very tiring and, as we noted, sometimes not generate the expected results…
Thank you for comment and appears!
Bye!
Tárcio,
I have not used the tactic of "they also do", in fact I am pointing the lobby of weapons as the main stakeholders in the continuity of drug trafficking, not a state benevolent and concerned about the health of the population.
Otherwise I think you tá sure, not roll much time discussing about it on the internet. Pena, who can not discuss or in universities and not on the streets, but all war against the system is delayed even…
Valew the attention!