Magazine feed itself: feedback from a reader
May 27, 2008 3 comments
The journal feed itself, I believe, came with the intention to be a new and innovative publication, is currently, 2 editions: Finnish and Swedish Pilot Journal, No. 1. As a reader, I have some analysis on the Revista feed itself, exposing some of my opinions about it. Repeating, are analyses of a mere reader, like many others, I am here, provided only and exclusively for readers of the magazine, no more, nothing less.
The pilot edition of the Journal feed itself has to say. Due to the "half pegadinha" involving the launch of the magazine - something related to April 1, the day of lies - and many have not given much credit or took seriously the whole story. Here are a few days after the Swedish Pilot is actually launched, with some reservations about the stories that accompanied his official announcement. The staff of the magazine is playful…
In this edition Pilot yielded considerable criticism (constructive and otherwise)! The key, I believe, was that of Canha, the Digital Design Paper, which gave an analysis on some aspects of the structure of the magazine. It was very interesting the article, not only for the "lesson" that readers of the blog received, but the free advice that the staff of feed is led in 0800. The funny is that some responsible for the magazine appeared to comment on, in my humble opinion, a little contempt, irony and lack of consideration, but go there…
Apparently it was only my impression, even, since the first edition "official" of the magazine, and change the layout, with just a field with Canha, the hitherto persona non grata personnel of the feed to (play, he spoke everything in goodwill)! :-)
About the content of the Journal feed itself
While no "official pronouncement" on the "mission" of the magazine feed itself, was published a matter in which a participant of the Swedish pilot, Daniel Becher, mentions that the magazine would be
an initiative to write a journal of blogger to blogger, with a number on the blogosphere so offline, to be read on the bus, on the balcony of the room or even in that intimate moment between you and potted morning.
In my view, implicitly, was given the scope of the magazine. Frankly, when I read "various issues", not imagined that found an average of 40% ~ 50% of the contents of feed itself (yes, I counted) and various issues facing the techniques of blogagem, blogosphere, tutorials and topics to blog strictly related to blogs in general.
Okay, I can be the flat's history and have the different view of the vast majority of readers of the magazine, but being "guilty" or not, siceramente unable to do the "link" between a magazine for bloggers and materials such as "The History and the production of Tequila "(area of cover…) and" XIS: You still eat a vai "! In other words, the subjects on blogs, and blogagem blogosphere is missing, seen by…
Another connection that I could not do involves key concepts, inherent to the blogs, such as simplicity and objectivity, which I personally believe they have been left in the background with the use of the source of difficult reading (squashed vertically), which was used predominantly in Swedish n . Article 1 of the feed itself and the fact it has been adopted the format "wide" A3.
Oras, if the intention is to have a number on the blogosphere so offline, do not understand the reason for this format… Or I'm the only one not to take A3 paper for printing at home?
Conclusion on the first editions of the magazine Feed Up
Stressing, once again, I wrote that the only identified as a reader of the magazine, nothing more. I made the maximum effort to give an opinion "non-technical" about it, because the "technical" sometimes is in me so that I can not "withdraw it"…
I believe that what I have identified on the magazine Feed is not only I who was identified, but at least as far to read my feeds and know I was the only one to show me.
I sincerely hope that, that the next editions will be better. I know how it is "a beginning" (because of already having participated in several) and I also know that constructive opinions make a real difference for future decision making to improve a work that, if well organized and consistent with the direction and wise, can make very sure!
Good luck, FEEDidos! ,-D














My view on the magazine feed themselves…
http://diegosoares.wordpress.com/2008/05/30/revista-feed-se-uma-nova-forma-de-publicidade-para-os-blogueiros-famosos/
Trackback on May 28, 2008
Trackback on May 30, 2008